Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
Price and specs side by side · USD per 1M tokens · verified 2026-10-11
// side by side
| metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|
| input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.07 |
| output / 1M | $0.50 | $0.34 |
| blended (3:1) | $0.20 | $0.1375 |
| cache read / 1M | $0.01 | — |
| context | 1M | 262.1K |
| max output | 128K | 32.8K |
| input types | text · image · pdf | text · image |
| reasoning | yes | yes |
| tool calling | yes | yes |
| structured output | yes | yes |
| open weights | no | yes |
| released | 2026-10-07 | 2026-04-02 |
| knowledge cutoff | 2026-06 | n/a |
| lab | Anthropic | Google |
// monthly cost scenarios
| workload | tokens in / out | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|
| Chatbot | 10M / 2M | $2.00 | $1.38 |
| RAG app | 50M / 5M | $7.50 | $5.20 |
| Coding agent | 20M / 10M | $7.00 | $4.80 |
// verdict
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is 31.2% cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a blended 3:1 input/output basis.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262.1K tokens).