Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Price and specs side by side · USD per 1M tokens · verified 2026-10-11
// side by side
| metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|
| input / 1M | $0.07 | $0.15 |
| output / 1M | $0.34 | $0.47 |
| blended (3:1) | $0.1375 | $0.23 |
| cache read / 1M | — | $0.016 |
| context | 262.1K | 1M |
| max output | 32.8K | 131.1K |
| input types | text · image | text · image · video |
| reasoning | yes | yes |
| tool calling | yes | yes |
| structured output | yes | yes |
| open weights | yes | no |
| released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-08-26 |
| knowledge cutoff | n/a | n/a |
| lab | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
// monthly cost scenarios
| workload | tokens in / out | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|
| Chatbot | 10M / 2M | $1.38 | $2.44 |
| RAG app | 50M / 5M | $5.20 | $9.85 |
| Coding agent | 20M / 10M | $4.80 | $7.70 |
// verdict
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is 40.2% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on a blended 3:1 input/output basis.
- Qwen3.8 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262.1K tokens).